Ralph Nader Calls for an Investigation

46

By dpsimswm

On April 11, 2011, Ralph Nader sent a letter to Inspector General Eric Thorson at the Department of the Treasury. Nader called for an investigation of "misleading statements by high government officials about the financial health of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac" prior to their nationalization. This 11 page document outlines a variety of issues, little noticed by the general public.

First, Nader points out some of the basics of the situation. The companies were suddenly and swiftly seized by the U.S. Government in September 2008. Shareholders were not bought out. They weren't eliminated. They continue to exist as 20.1% owners of a company without a defined future. Since 2008, they've become the de facto mortgage market, along with FHA, making mortgages at a government mandated loss.

Next, Nader illustrates the fact that multiple government officials said the companies were "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," or in "good shape" two months before shareholders were essentially wiped out. The list of shareholder pacifiers includes James Lockhart (OFHEO Director), Barney Frank (Congressman), Chuck Greener (Fannie VP), Christopher Dodd (Senator), Hank Paulson (Treasury Secretary), Ben Bernanke (Federal Reserve Chairman), and Daniel Mudd (Fannie CEO).

The letter then continues to outline some questions that need to be answered. In my opinion, the following questions are the ones most important to be answered by the Treasury:

  • "If the two companies should recover, does the FHFA intend to release Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from conservatorship and relist their securities on the NYSE?"
  • "Does the Treasury Department have a moral obligation to provide GSE common stockholders with the legal rights they had before the conservatorship was established?"


Hub Opinion Polls

Have politicians decided to bury shareholders while winding down their former gem of mortgage finance?

  • Yes. By maintaining a 10% dividend on the borrowing rates, shareholders are effectively eliminated.
  • No. Shareholders are done anyway.
  • Don't know. The regulator owns the companies and they are the only voice.
See results without voting

Does the Treasury have a conflict of interest with regard to the GSEs?

  • Yes. They own 79.9% of the companies and regulate them.
  • No.
See results without voting

Comments

No comments yet.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working